The Dialectical Model in Comparative Perspective Essays -- Science Phi

Mankind has not always isolated itself from spirit. For the majority of his recital, man recognized a train for a dependent and intimate kin with record. Nature was his provider and caretaker, a benevolent nurturer intending no harm, a ensample now known as organic. As the human mind began to increasingly fashion matter to fit its purpose, however, technological innovation began to supplant spirit as mans perceived source of sustenance. Thus applied science began its ongoing ascent, becoming a means to subdue a uninitiated nature and raise man above his lowly origins. In short, a new hierarchical model of nature coalesced. Nevertheless, this relatively new effigy could not entirely displace its predecessor, which evolved into an impotent longing embodied in the pastoral model. Human beings oscillate in their desires for these dominant models of nature, each possessing supplication within appropriate contexts. This underlying struggle suggests their inadequacy as singularl y accurate depictions of nature, and a third model must replace these noncurrent modes of thinking. The dominant models serve as guides to this third model a few modifications of their flaws actually help form its foundation. This model is known as the dialectic model, and consists of a unity of all opposites and entities. While every model of nature seeks to engender a proper appreciation of nature, some are incommensurable on this point this observation explains why they must generally capture all others. The dialectical model attempts to remove such a need by discarding the notion of an independent human existence. By analyzing these models through history and contemporary examples, the dialectical model emerges as a resolution of many inconsistencies in previous mo... ...ted. An integrated, cognizant existence within an undivided nature provides the entire basis one needs to evaluate human activities. victorian examination of the whole is born of proper placement of the se lf.Works CitedRedclift, Michael, and whole wheat flour Woodgate, ed. Sociology and the Environment. Social Theory and the Global Environment. London Routledge, 1995.Ross, Carolyn, ed. Writing Nature. New York St. Martins Press, 1995.Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Nature. Ross 421-423.Oates, Joyce Carol. Against Nature. Ross 458-463.Handouts Bibliographical Information UnavailableMartin, Emily. Body Narratives, Body Boundaries.Merchant, Carolyn. Nature as Female.Nash, Roderick. Wilderness and the American Mind.RepresentationsMaxim. Feb. 2001.16 Feb. 2001 16 Feb. 2001 http//www.particleadventure.org/frameless/chart.html