Wednesday, March 27, 2019
John Deweys Critique of Socioeconomic Individualism Essay -- Sociolog
My paper attempts to a precisely the consistency of jakes Deweys non- psycheistic individualism. It details Deweys claim that the tralatitious dualism opposing the individual to the social is politically debilitating. We find Dewey in the 20s and 30s, for example, arguing that the creation of a genuine human beings arena, one(a) capable of precluding the rise of an artificial chasm between sociality and individualityor, rather, one capable of precluding the rise of an artificial chasm between notions of sociality and individualityhad itself been forestalled by an inherited, outdated, but nonetheless dominant custom called individualism. By blocking public investigating itself, by enervating what Dewey called social inquiry, and thus by misguiding historically cranky assessments of slippery social phenomena, our contingently strapped individualism drifts aimlessly and destructively through the set up era. Insofar as it fails to realize how publicity and individuality can be a congruous, inextricable, and mutually conditioning pair, individualism leeches many of todays individuals of their situated and situating historical potential. In the final chapter of his work The Public and its Problems (PAIP) John Dewey suggests that, despite the insistence of most social theorists, if we regard the so-called individual/social distinction as a gap to be bridged or as an antithesis to be synthesized then our nose for public & democratic advance has been tricked by a central red herring of political modernnessThe preliminary to fruitful discussion of social matters is that certain obstacles shall be overcome, obstacles residing in our present conceptions of the method of social inquiry. One of the obstructions in the path is the seemingl... ...ical progress, and simply then will we lay the foundation for the construction of public apparati which do not merely police atomic selves negatively in their battles for economic supremacy and which do not merely reconci le Society to the claims of toffee-nosed Selves but which produce selves habitually resistant to atomization.Indeed, as we also indicated above, jibe to Dewey the problem of publicity in modern society and the modern stir lies less in need of bridging the gap between the one and the many as in showing the impractical effects of recovering jibe to the conceptual scheme of a gap. It is currently anathema, in other words, to think sacrificially of publicity, to think that a lively public arena can personify only when certain individual claims are sacrificed or, conversely, that individuality will flourish only at the expense of the greater public good.