Was the treaty of Versailles a fair treaty? Explain.

It is difficult to decide whether the accord of Versailles was a fair or an unfair treaty - it depends on the point of view, but I personally think that the treaty was kind of harsh and unfair... The master(prenominal) reason why I think that this treaty was rather unfair is that Germany didnt go a say in its have got future, and I think that, despite all, Germany should have had the opportunity to go to Versailles and to discuss together with all the other nations and with the major(ip) powers - the USA, France and Britain, what should fail of its (Germanys) future. From the french perspective, the Germans deserved to give up everything in rig to lick amends for the destruction they caused in France, therefore, the final treaty wasnt intemperate them enough. However, to the American and British leaders, it seemed impossible to place the consummate whip on notwithstanding one country, but in the end, it was in the main George Clemenceau who got his way around thin gs... He was the one who was in point leading the treaty, and who lured Woodrow Wilson (USA) and David Lloyd George (Great Britain) into letting him make all the major decisions concerning the treaty, and therefore, Germany was truly punished way too harshly. The terms of the treaty were sort of clear and quite harsh... Germany had to accept all the blame for first the war and it had to pay reparations to the allies for the damage caused by the war. These were payed in money, land, coal, livestock and goods. All Germanys overseas colonies were taken away, and were fit in by the League of Nations, which effectively meant that France and Britain controlled them. So this meant that Germany not simply did not have any overseas colonies, but they were also... If you anticipate to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper